diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | Tasks.org | 146 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 144 deletions
@@ -2,148 +2,6 @@ #+TODO: TODO(t) DOING(w) | DONE(d) BLOCKED(b) CANCELED(c) #+FILETAGS: :@school: -* Writing +* TODO Redraft (#1) -** TODO Abstract - -** TODO Introduction - -*** DONE Introduce problem - -**** DONE Container types common in programs - -**** DONE Functionally identical implementations - -**** DONE Large difference in performance - -*** DONE Motivate w/ effectiveness claims - -*** DONE Overview of aims & approach - -**** DONE Scalability to larger projects - -**** DONE Ease of integration into existing projects - -**** DONE Ease of adding new container types - -**** DONE Flexibility of selection - -*** TODO Overview of results - -** DONE Background - -*** DONE Introduce problem - -*** DONE Functional vs non-functional requirements - -*** DONE Existing approaches & their shortfalls - -*** DONE Lead to next chapter - -** DONE Design - -*** DONE Usage Example - -*** DONE Primrose Integration - -**** DONE Explain role in entire process - -**** DONE Short explanation of selection method - -**** DONE Abstraction over backend - -*** DONE Building cost models - -**** DONE Benchmarks - -**** DONE Linear Regression - -**** DONE Limitations - -*** DONE Profiling applications - -**** DONE Data collected - -**** DONE Segmentation - -*** DONE Selection process & adaptive containers - -**** DONE Selection process - -**** DONE Adaptive container detection - -** DONE Implementation - -*** DONE Modifications to Primrose - -**** DONE API - -**** DONE Mapping trait - -**** DONE Resiliency, etc - -*** DONE Cost models - -**** DONE Benchmarker crate - -**** DONE Code generation - -**** DONE Chosen benchmarks - -**** DONE Fitting - -*** DONE Profiling wrapper - -**** DONE Use of Drop - -**** DONE Generics and stuff - -*** DONE Selection / Codegen - -**** DONE Selection Algorithm incl Adaptive - -**** DONE Implementation w/ const generics - -**** DONE Generated code (opaque types) - -** DONE Results & Analysis - -*** DONE Testing setup, benchmarking rationale - -**** DONE Specs and VM setup - -**** DONE Reproducibility - -*** DONE Cost model analysis - -**** DONE Insertion operations - -**** DONE Contains operations - -**** DONE Comment on some bad/weird ones - -**** DONE Conclusion - -*** DONE Predictions - -**** DONE Chosen benchmarks - -**** DONE Effect of selection on benchmarks (spread in execution time) - -**** DONE Summarise predicted versus actual - -**** DONE Evaluate performance - -**** DONE Comment on distribution of best implementation - -**** DONE Surprising ones / Explain failures - -*** DONE Performance of adaptive containers - -**** DONE Find where adaptive containers get suggested - -**** DONE Comment on relative performance speedup - -**** DONE Suggest future improvements? - -** TODO Conclusion +* TODO Get more feedback |