diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/manual/installation')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/manual/installation/installing-binary.xml | 301 |
1 files changed, 290 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/doc/manual/installation/installing-binary.xml b/doc/manual/installation/installing-binary.xml index 3f57f47b5..8d548f0ea 100644 --- a/doc/manual/installation/installing-binary.xml +++ b/doc/manual/installation/installing-binary.xml @@ -6,16 +6,30 @@ <title>Installing a Binary Distribution</title> -<para>If you are using Linux or macOS, the easiest way to install Nix -is to run the following command: +<para> + If you are using Linux or macOS versions up to 10.14 (Mojave), the + easiest way to install Nix is to run the following command: +</para> <screen> $ sh <(curl https://nixos.org/nix/install) </screen> -As of Nix 2.1.0, the Nix installer will always default to creating a -single-user installation, however opting in to the multi-user -installation is highly recommended. +<para> + If you're using macOS 10.15 (Catalina) or newer, consult + <link linkend="sect-macos-installation">the macOS installation instructions</link> + before installing. +</para> + +<para> + As of Nix 2.1.0, the Nix installer will always default to creating a + single-user installation, however opting in to the multi-user + installation is highly recommended. + <!-- TODO: this explains *neither* why the default version is + single-user, nor why we'd recommend multi-user over the default. + True prospective users don't have much basis for evaluating this. + What's it to me? Who should pick which? Why? What if I pick wrong? + --> </para> <section xml:id="sect-single-user-installation"> @@ -36,7 +50,7 @@ run this under your usual user account, <emphasis>not</emphasis> as root. The script will invoke <command>sudo</command> to create <filename>/nix</filename> if it doesn’t already exist. If you don’t have <command>sudo</command>, you should manually create -<command>/nix</command> first as root, e.g.: +<filename>/nix</filename> first as root, e.g.: <screen> $ mkdir /nix @@ -47,7 +61,7 @@ The install script will modify the first writable file from amongst <filename>.bash_profile</filename>, <filename>.bash_login</filename> and <filename>.profile</filename> to source <filename>~/.nix-profile/etc/profile.d/nix.sh</filename>. You can set -the <command>NIX_INSTALLER_NO_MODIFY_PROFILE</command> environment +the <envar>NIX_INSTALLER_NO_MODIFY_PROFILE</envar> environment variable before executing the install script to disable this behaviour. </para> @@ -81,12 +95,10 @@ $ rm -rf /nix <para> You can instruct the installer to perform a multi-user installation on your system: - - <screen> - sh <(curl https://nixos.org/nix/install) --daemon -</screen> </para> + <screen>sh <(curl https://nixos.org/nix/install) --daemon</screen> + <para> The multi-user installation of Nix will create build users between the user IDs 30001 and 30032, and a group with the group ID 30000. @@ -136,6 +148,273 @@ sudo rm /Library/LaunchDaemons/org.nixos.nix-daemon.plist </section> +<section xml:id="sect-macos-installation"> + <title>macOS Installation</title> + + <para> + Starting with macOS 10.15 (Catalina), the root filesystem is read-only. + This means <filename>/nix</filename> can no longer live on your system + volume, and that you'll need a workaround to install Nix. + </para> + + <para> + The recommended approach, which creates an unencrypted APFS volume + for your Nix store and a "synthetic" empty directory to mount it + over at <filename>/nix</filename>, is least likely to impair Nix + or your system. + </para> + + <note><para> + With all separate-volume approaches, it's possible something on + your system (particularly daemons/services and restored apps) may + need access to your Nix store before the volume is mounted. Adding + additional encryption makes this more likely. + </para></note> + + <para> + If you're using a recent Mac with a + <link xlink:href="https://www.apple.com/euro/mac/shared/docs/Apple_T2_Security_Chip_Overview.pdf">T2 chip</link>, + your drive will still be encrypted at rest (in which case "unencrypted" + is a bit of a misnomer). To use this approach, just install Nix with: + </para> + + <screen>$ sh <(curl https://nixos.org/nix/install) --darwin-use-unencrypted-nix-store-volume</screen> + + <para> + If you don't like the sound of this, you'll want to weigh the + other approaches and tradeoffs detailed in this section. + </para> + + <note> + <title>Eventual solutions?</title> + <para> + All of the known workarounds have drawbacks, but we hope + better solutions will be available in the future. Some that + we have our eye on are: + </para> + <orderedlist> + <listitem> + <para> + A true firmlink would enable the Nix store to live on the + primary data volume without the build problems caused by + the symlink approach. End users cannot currently + create true firmlinks. + </para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para> + If the Nix store volume shared FileVault encryption + with the primary data volume (probably by using the same + volume group and role), FileVault encryption could be + easily supported by the installer without requiring + manual setup by each user. + </para> + </listitem> + </orderedlist> + </note> + + <section xml:id="sect-macos-installation-change-store-prefix"> + <title>Change the Nix store path prefix</title> + <para> + Changing the default prefix for the Nix store is a simple + approach which enables you to leave it on your root volume, + where it can take full advantage of FileVault encryption if + enabled. Unfortunately, this approach also opts your device out + of some benefits that are enabled by using the same prefix + across systems: + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para> + Your system won't be able to take advantage of the binary + cache (unless someone is able to stand up and support + duplicate caching infrastructure), which means you'll + spend more time waiting for builds. + </para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para> + It's harder to build and deploy packages to Linux systems. + </para> + </listitem> + <!-- TODO: may be more here --> + </itemizedlist> + + <!-- TODO: Yes, but how?! --> + + It would also possible (and often requested) to just apply this + change ecosystem-wide, but it's an intrusive process that has + side effects we want to avoid for now. + <!-- magnificent hand-wavy gesture --> + </para> + <para> + </para> + </section> + + <section xml:id="sect-macos-installation-encrypted-volume"> + <title>Use a separate encrypted volume</title> + <para> + If you like, you can also add encryption to the recommended + approach taken by the installer. You can do this by pre-creating + an encrypted volume before you run the installer--or you can + run the installer and encrypt the volume it creates later. + <!-- TODO: see later note about whether this needs both add-encryption and from-scratch directions --> + </para> + <para> + In either case, adding encryption to a second volume isn't quite + as simple as enabling FileVault for your boot volume. Before you + dive in, there are a few things to weigh: + </para> + <orderedlist> + <listitem> + <para> + The additional volume won't be encrypted with your existing + FileVault key, so you'll need another mechanism to decrypt + the volume. + </para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para> + You can store the password in Keychain to automatically + decrypt the volume on boot--but it'll have to wait on Keychain + and may not mount before your GUI apps restore. If any of + your launchd agents or apps depend on Nix-installed software + (for example, if you use a Nix-installed login shell), the + restore may fail or break. + </para> + <para> + On a case-by-case basis, you may be able to work around this + problem by using <command>wait4path</command> to block + execution until your executable is available. + </para> + <para> + It's also possible to decrypt and mount the volume earlier + with a login hook--but this mechanism appears to be + deprecated and its future is unclear. + </para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para> + You can hard-code the password in the clear, so that your + store volume can be decrypted before Keychain is available. + </para> + </listitem> + </orderedlist> + <para> + If you are comfortable navigating these tradeoffs, you can encrypt the volume with + something along the lines of: + <!-- TODO: + I don't know if this also needs from-scratch instructions? + can we just recommend use-the-installer-and-then-encrypt? + --> + </para> + <!-- + TODO: it looks like this option can be encryptVolume|encrypt|enableFileVault + + It may be more clear to use encryptVolume, here? FileVault seems + heavily associated with the boot-volume behavior; I worry + a little that it can mislead here, especially as it gets + copied around minus doc context...? + --> + <screen>alice$ diskutil apfs enableFileVault /nix -user disk</screen> + + <!-- TODO: and then go into detail on the mount/decrypt approaches? --> + </section> + + <section xml:id="sect-macos-installation-symlink"> + <!-- + Maybe a good razor is: if we'd hate having to support someone who + installed Nix this way, it shouldn't even be detailed? + --> + <title>Symlink the Nix store to a custom location</title> + <para> + Another simple approach is using <filename>/etc/synthetic.conf</filename> + to symlink the Nix store to the data volume. This option also + enables your store to share any configured FileVault encryption. + Unfortunately, builds that resolve the symlink may leak the + canonical path or even fail. + </para> + <para> + Because of these downsides, we can't recommend this approach. + </para> + <!-- Leaving out instructions for this one. --> + </section> + + <section xml:id="sect-macos-installation-recommended-notes"> + <title>Notes on the recommended approach</title> + <para> + This section goes into a little more detail on the recommended + approach. You don't need to understand it to run the installer, + but it can serve as a helpful reference if you run into trouble. + </para> + <orderedlist> + <listitem> + <para> + In order to compose user-writable locations into the new + read-only system root, Apple introduced a new concept called + <literal>firmlinks</literal>, which it describes as a + "bi-directional wormhole" between two filesystems. You can + see the current firmlinks in <filename>/usr/share/firmlinks</filename>. + Unfortunately, firmlinks aren't (currently?) user-configurable. + </para> + + <para> + For special cases like NFS mount points or package manager roots, + <link xlink:href="https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/System/Conceptual/ManPages_iPhoneOS/man5/synthetic.conf.5.html">synthetic.conf(5)</link> + supports limited user-controlled file-creation (of symlinks, + and synthetic empty directories) at <filename>/</filename>. + To create a synthetic empty directory for mounting at <filename>/nix</filename>, + add the following line to <filename>/etc/synthetic.conf</filename> + (create it if necessary): + </para> + + <screen>nix</screen> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para> + This configuration is applied at boot time, but you can use + <command>apfs.util</command> to trigger creation (not deletion) + of new entries without a reboot: + </para> + + <screen>alice$ /System/Library/Filesystems/apfs.fs/Contents/Resources/apfs.util -B</screen> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para> + Create the new APFS volume with diskutil: + </para> + + <screen>alice$ sudo diskutil apfs addVolume diskX APFS 'Nix Store' -mountpoint /nix</screen> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para> + Using <command>vifs</command>, add the new mount to + <filename>/etc/fstab</filename>. If it doesn't already have + other entries, it should look something like: + </para> + +<screen> +# +# Warning - this file should only be modified with vifs(8) +# +# Failure to do so is unsupported and may be destructive. +# +LABEL=Nix\040Store /nix apfs rw,nobrowse +</screen> + + <para> + The nobrowse setting will keep Spotlight from indexing this + volume, and keep it from showing up on your desktop. + </para> + </listitem> + </orderedlist> + </section> + +</section> + <section xml:id="sect-nix-install-pinned-version-url"> <title>Installing a pinned Nix version from a URL</title> |