aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/manual/src/SUMMARY.md.in1
-rw-r--r--doc/manual/src/command-ref/nix-shell.md3
-rw-r--r--doc/manual/src/contributing/experimental-features.md91
-rw-r--r--doc/manual/src/glossary.md28
-rw-r--r--doc/manual/src/release-notes/rl-next.md17
5 files changed, 129 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/doc/manual/src/SUMMARY.md.in b/doc/manual/src/SUMMARY.md.in
index 4b654567f..5bf274550 100644
--- a/doc/manual/src/SUMMARY.md.in
+++ b/doc/manual/src/SUMMARY.md.in
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@
- [Glossary](glossary.md)
- [Contributing](contributing/contributing.md)
- [Hacking](contributing/hacking.md)
+ - [Experimental Features](contributing/experimental-features.md)
- [CLI guideline](contributing/cli-guideline.md)
- [Release Notes](release-notes/release-notes.md)
- [Release X.Y (202?-??-??)](release-notes/rl-next.md)
diff --git a/doc/manual/src/command-ref/nix-shell.md b/doc/manual/src/command-ref/nix-shell.md
index 9f36929f7..576e5ba0b 100644
--- a/doc/manual/src/command-ref/nix-shell.md
+++ b/doc/manual/src/command-ref/nix-shell.md
@@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ shell in which to build it:
```console
$ nix-shell '<nixpkgs>' -A pan
[nix-shell]$ eval ${unpackPhase:-unpackPhase}
-[nix-shell]$ cd pan-*
+[nix-shell]$ cd $sourceRoot
+[nix-shell]$ eval ${patchPhase:-patchPhase}
[nix-shell]$ eval ${configurePhase:-configurePhase}
[nix-shell]$ eval ${buildPhase:-buildPhase}
[nix-shell]$ ./pan/gui/pan
diff --git a/doc/manual/src/contributing/experimental-features.md b/doc/manual/src/contributing/experimental-features.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f1db22751
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/manual/src/contributing/experimental-features.md
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+This section describes the notion of *experimental features*, and how it fits into the big picture of the development of Nix.
+
+# What are experimental features?
+
+Experimental features are considered unstable, which means that they can be changed or removed at any time.
+Users must explicitly enable them by toggling the associated [experimental feature flags](@docroot@/command-ref/conf-file.md#conf-experimental-features).
+This allows accessing unstable functionality without unwittingly relying on it.
+
+Experimental feature flags were first introduced in [Nix 2.4](@docroot@/release-notes/rl-2.4.md).
+Before that, Nix did have experimental features, but they were not guarded by flags and were merely documented as unstable.
+This was a source of confusion and controversy.
+
+# When should a new feature be marked experimental?
+
+A change in the Nix codebase should be guarded by an experimental feature flag if it is considered likely to be reverted or adapted in a backwards-incompatible manner after gathering more experience with it in practice.
+
+Examples:
+
+- Changes to the Nix language, such as new built-ins, syntactic or semantic changes, etc.
+- Changes to the command-line interface
+
+# Lifecycle of an experimental feature
+
+Experimental features have to be treated on a case-by-case basis.
+However, the standard workflow for an experimental feature is as follows:
+
+- A new feature is implemented in a *pull request*
+ - It is guarded by an experimental feature flag that is disabled by default
+- The pull request is merged, the *experimental* feature ends up in a release
+ - Using the feature requires explicitly enabling it, signifying awareness of the potential risks
+ - Being experimental, the feature can still be changed arbitrarily
+- The feature can be *removed*
+ - The associated experimental feature flag is also removed
+- The feature can be declared *stable*
+ - The associated experimental feature flag is removed
+ - There should be enough evidence of users having tried the feature, such as feedback, fixed bugs, demonstrations of how it is put to use
+ - Maintainers must feel confident that:
+ - The feature is designed and implemented sensibly, that it is fit for purpose
+ - Potential interactions are well-understood
+ - Stabilising the feature will not incur an outsized maintenance burden in the future
+
+The following diagram illustrates the process:
+
+```
+ .------.
+ | idea |
+ '------'
+ |
+ discussion, design, implementation
+ |
+ | .-------.
+ | | |
+ v v |
+ .--------------. review
+ | pull request | |
+ '--------------' |
+ | ^ | |
+ | | '-------'
+ .---' '----.
+ | |
+ merge user feedback,
+ | (breaking) changes
+ | |
+ '---. .----'
+ | |
+ v |
+ +--------------+
+ .---| experimental |----.
+ | +--------------+ |
+ | |
+decision to stabilise decision against
+ | keeping the feature
+ | |
+ v v
+ +--------+ +---------+
+ | stable | | removed |
+ +--------+ +---------+
+```
+
+# Relation to the RFC process
+
+Experimental features and [RFCs](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/) both allow approaching substantial changes while minimizing the risk.
+However they serve different purposes:
+
+- An experimental feature enables developers to iterate on and deliver a new idea without committing to it or requiring a costly long-running fork.
+ It is primarily an issue of *implementation*, targeting Nix developers and early testers.
+- The goal of an RFC is to make explicit all the implications of a change:
+ Explain why it is wanted, which new use-cases it enables, which interface changes it requires, etc.
+ It is primarily an issue of *design* and *communication*, targeting the broader community.
+
+This means that experimental features and RFCs are orthogonal mechanisms, and can be used independently or together as needed.
diff --git a/doc/manual/src/glossary.md b/doc/manual/src/glossary.md
index b56d857d1..4eedb2e93 100644
--- a/doc/manual/src/glossary.md
+++ b/doc/manual/src/glossary.md
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
Example: `/nix/store/g946hcz4c8mdvq2g8vxx42z51qb71rvp-git-2.38.1.drv`
- See [`nix show-derivation`](./command-ref/new-cli/nix3-show-derivation.md) (experimental) for displaying the contents of store derivations.
+ See [`nix derivation show`](./command-ref/new-cli/nix3-derivation-show.md) (experimental) for displaying the contents of store derivations.
[store derivation]: #gloss-store-derivation
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
invoked, the Nix store can be referred to
as a "_local_" or a "_remote_" one:
- + A *local store* exists on the filesystem of
+ + A [local store]{#gloss-local-store} exists on the filesystem of
the machine where Nix is invoked. You can use other
local stores by passing the `--store` flag to the
`nix` command. Local stores can be used for building derivations.
@@ -65,17 +65,17 @@
served by the `nix-serve` Perl script.
[store]: #gloss-store
+ [local store]: #gloss-local-store
- [chroot store]{#gloss-chroot-store}\
- A local store whose canonical path is anything other than `/nix/store`.
+ A [local store] whose canonical path is anything other than `/nix/store`.
- [binary cache]{#gloss-binary-cache}\
A *binary cache* is a Nix store which uses a different format: its
metadata and signatures are kept in `.narinfo` files rather than in a
- Nix database. This different format simplifies serving store objects
- over the network, but cannot host builds. Examples of binary caches
- include S3 buckets and the [NixOS binary
- cache](https://cache.nixos.org).
+ [Nix database]. This different format simplifies serving store objects
+ over the network, but cannot host builds. Examples of binary caches
+ include S3 buckets and the [NixOS binary cache](https://cache.nixos.org).
- [store path]{#gloss-store-path}\
The location of a [store object] in the file system, i.e., an
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
[fixed-output derivations](#gloss-fixed-output-derivation).
- [substitute]{#gloss-substitute}\
- A substitute is a command invocation stored in the Nix database that
+ A substitute is a command invocation stored in the [Nix database] that
describes how to build a store object, bypassing the normal build
mechanism (i.e., derivations). Typically, the substitute builds the
store object by downloading a pre-built version of the store object
@@ -127,6 +127,14 @@
builder can rely on external inputs such as the network or the
system time) but the Nix model assumes it.
+ - Nix database{#gloss-nix-database}\
+ An SQlite database to track [reference]s between [store object]s.
+ This is an implementation detail of the [local store].
+
+ Default location: `/nix/var/nix/db`.
+
+ [Nix database]: #gloss-nix-database
+
- [Nix expression]{#gloss-nix-expression}\
A high-level description of software packages and compositions
thereof. Deploying software using Nix entails writing Nix
@@ -175,9 +183,9 @@
- [validity]{#gloss-validity}\
A store path is valid if all [store object]s in its [closure] can be read from the [store].
- For a local store, this means:
+ For a [local store], this means:
- The store path leads to an existing [store object] in that [store].
- - The store path is listed in the Nix database as being valid.
+ - The store path is listed in the [Nix database] as being valid.
- All paths in the store path's [closure] are valid.
[validity]: #gloss-validity
diff --git a/doc/manual/src/release-notes/rl-next.md b/doc/manual/src/release-notes/rl-next.md
index ae159de8f..5b62836bf 100644
--- a/doc/manual/src/release-notes/rl-next.md
+++ b/doc/manual/src/release-notes/rl-next.md
@@ -39,3 +39,20 @@
* `man nix-store-<operation>` and `man nix-env-<operation>`
* `nix-store --help --<operation>` and `nix-env --help --<operation>`.
+
+* Nix when used as a client now checks whether the store (the server) trusts the client.
+ (The store always had to check whether it trusts the client, but now the client is informed of the store's decision.)
+ This is useful for scripting interactions with (non-legacy-ssh) remote Nix stores.
+
+ `nix store ping` and `nix doctor` now display this information.
+
+* A new command `nix derivation add` is created, to allow adding derivations to the store without involving the Nix language.
+ It exists to round out our collection of basic utility/plumbing commands, and allow for a low barrier-to-entry way of experimenting with alternative front-ends to the Nix Store.
+ It uses the same JSON layout as `nix show-derivation`, and is its inverse.
+
+* `nix show-derivation` has been renamed to `nix derivation show`.
+ This matches `nix derivation add`, and avoids bloating the top-level namespace.
+ The old name is still kept as an alias for compatibility, however.
+
+* The `nix derivation {add,show}` JSON format now includes the derivation name as a top-level field.
+ This is useful in general, but especially necessary for the `add` direction, as otherwise we would need to pass in the name out of band for certain cases.