1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/dyn-drv/eval-outputOf.sh b/tests/dyn-drv/eval-outputOf.sh
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..99d917c06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/dyn-drv/eval-outputOf.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+source ./common.sh
+
+# Without the dynamic-derivations XP feature, we don't have the builtin.
+nix --experimental-features 'nix-command' eval --impure  --expr \
+    'assert ! (builtins ? outputOf); ""'
+
+# Test that a string is required.
+#
+# We currently require a string to be passed, rather than a derivation
+# object that could be coerced to a string. We might liberalise this in
+# the future so it does work, but there are some design questions to
+# resolve first. Adding a test so we don't liberalise it by accident.
+expectStderr 1 nix --experimental-features 'nix-command dynamic-derivations' eval --impure --expr \
+    'builtins.outputOf (import ../dependencies.nix) "out"' \
+    | grepQuiet "value is a set while a string was expected"
+
+# Test that "DrvDeep" string contexts are not supported at this time
+#
+# Like the above, this is a restriction we could relax later.
+expectStderr 1 nix --experimental-features 'nix-command dynamic-derivations' eval --impure --expr \
+    'builtins.outputOf (import ../dependencies.nix).drvPath "out"' \
+    | grepQuiet "has a context which refers to a complete source and binary closure. This is not supported at this time"
+
+# Test using `builtins.outputOf` with static derivations
+testStaticHello () {
+    nix eval --impure --expr \
+        'with (import ./text-hashed-output.nix); let
+           a = hello.outPath;
+           b = builtins.outputOf (builtins.unsafeDiscardOutputDependency hello.drvPath) "out";
+         in builtins.trace a
+           (builtins.trace b
+             (assert a == b; null))'
+}
+
+# Test with a regular old input-addresed derivation
+#
+# `builtins.outputOf` works without ca-derivations and doesn't create a
+# placeholder but just returns the output path.
+testStaticHello
+
+# Test with content addressed derivation.
+NIX_TESTS_CA_BY_DEFAULT=1 testStaticHello
+
+# Test with derivation-producing derivation
+#
+# This is hardly different from the preceding cases, except that we're
+# only taking 1 outputOf out of 2 possible outputOfs. Note that
+# `.outPath` could be defined as `outputOf drvPath`, which is what we're
+# testing here. The other `outputOf` that we're not testing here is the
+# use of _dynamic_ derivations.
+nix eval --impure --expr \
+    'with (import ./text-hashed-output.nix); let
+       a = producingDrv.outPath;
+       b = builtins.outputOf (builtins.builtins.unsafeDiscardOutputDependency producingDrv.drvPath) "out";
+     in builtins.trace a
+       (builtins.trace b
+         (assert a == b; null))'
+
+# Test with unbuilt output of derivation-producing derivation.
+#
+# This function similar to `testStaticHello` used above, but instead of
+# checking the property on a constant derivation, we check it on a
+# derivation that's from another derivation's output (outPath).
+testDynamicHello () {
+    nix eval --impure --expr \
+        'with (import ./text-hashed-output.nix); let
+           a = builtins.outputOf producingDrv.outPath "out";
+           b = builtins.outputOf (builtins.outputOf (builtins.unsafeDiscardOutputDependency producingDrv.drvPath) "out") "out";
+         in builtins.trace a
+           (builtins.trace b
+             (assert a == b; null))'
+}
+
+# inner dynamic derivation is input-addressed
+testDynamicHello
+
+# inner dynamic derivation is content-addressed
+NIX_TESTS_CA_BY_DEFAULT=1 testDynamicHello