| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This was causing a few bits of suffering downstream, in particular, in
the NixOS module, which, after this change, can have the
`officialRelease` stuff in *it* completely deleted since we now have
correct defaulting in package.nix for it.
It also eliminates some automated editing of Nix files, which is
certainly always welcome to eliminate.
Fixes: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/406
Change-Id: Id12f3018cff4633e379dbfcbe26b7bc84922bdaf
|
|
Well that is embarrassing. I think the proper thing is to just quickly
ship a -rc2, so I will open a backport of this.
$ curl https://releases.lix.systems/manifest.nix
# This file was generated by releng/create_release.xsh in Lix
{
aarch64-linux = "/nix/store/mrbknq000af7iaqhk53bnpk1fvfrc1xp-lix-2.90.0-rc1";
aarch64-darwin = "/nix/store/z1bdccwsk34iv491aygh0mm1lgpf7yy1-lix-2.90.0-rc1";
x86_64-darwin = "/nix/store/xqvfpdhzck44v6kyhgi9f8v0xybksb6a-lix-2.90.0-rc1";
x86_64-linux = "/nix/store/h2ml0nx4477r84y82jgm8y80jpr72gqw-lix-release-tarballs";
}
Change-Id: I9cf007c850c2faf995a3a9d92457517b8501d1a1
|
|
Also delete the obsolescent maintainers/release-notes script that is
unmaintained.
Change-Id: I3f4a75d790e8e00e970358ca8f32e8295c91aac3
|
|
For now we just need to put the release notes in the final spot. We will
have to fix the date on both 2.90 and 2.91 branches, but such as it is.
Release created with releng/create_release.xsh
Closes: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/318
Change-Id: I38e79b40e7f632c8a286f2f09865a84dc93eca90
|
|
I guess this is kind of important to being able to "release it".
Change-Id: Id6f295d0b4944fa1203783a400a246727dbd94b6
|
|
There were two bugs I found:
1. If the build isn't already done in the store, nix-store --realise
does not know how to build it. You have to just give it the
derivation and I guess it will realise all outputs, which is fine.
2. cp without -T will not overwrite an existing manual directory,
creating a path manual/manual.
Change-Id: Ibebfd136a266da5330944a985e636ebb776f1909
|
|
I am *reasonably* confident that this releng infrastructure can actually
build a Lix 2.90 and release it successfully. Let's make it possible to
do, and add some cute colours to the confirmation message.
Change-Id: I85e498b6fb49ffc5e75c0a72c5e45fb1f69030d3
|
|
For example, when releasing from release-2.90, if `main` has a 2.91 tag
ancestor, we know that 2.91 was released, so we should *not* tag latest.
Change-Id: Ia56b17a2ee03bbec74b7c271c742858c690d450d
|
|
If we don't want to have separate registry tags by architecture (EWWWW),
we need to be able to build multiarch docker images. This is pretty
simple, and just requires making a manifest pointing to each of the
component images.
I was *going* to just do this API prodding with manifest-tool, but it
doesn't support putting metadata on the outer manifest, which is
actually kind of a problem because it then doesn't render the metadata
on github. So I guess we get a simple little containers API
implementation that is 90% auth code.
Change-Id: I8bdd118d4cbc13b23224f2fb174b232432686bea
|
|
This uses skopeo to not think about docker daemons. I, however, noticed
that the docker image we had would have totally terrible cache hits, so
I rewrote it.
Fixes: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/252
Change-Id: I3c5b6c1f3ba0b9dfcac212b2148f390e0cd542b7
|
|
Change-Id: Ifd0b51425ee4955e0230fb2804a6f54ef0fe16e9
|
|
This can release x86_64-linux binaries to staging, with ephemeral keys.
I think it's good enough to review at least at this point, so we don't
keep adding more stuff to it to make it harder to review.
Change-Id: Ie95e8f35d1252f5d014e819566f170b30eda152e
|
