aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/libstore/path-with-outputs.hh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-10-08Fix gcc warning -Wmissing-field-initializersLulu
The approach that was taken here was to add default values to the type definitions rather than specify them whenever they are missing. Now the only remaining warning is '-Wunused-parameter' which @jade said is usually counterproductive and that we can just disable it: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/456#issuecomment-6617 So this change adds the flags '-Wall', '-Wextra' and '-Wno-unused-parameter', so that all warnings are enabled except for '-Wunused-parameter'. Change-Id: Ic223a964d67ab429e8da804c0721ba5e25d53012
2023-08-10Make the Derived Path family of types inductive for dynamic derivationsJohn Ericson
We want to be able to write down `foo.drv^bar.drv^baz`: `foo.drv^bar.drv` is the dynamic derivation (since it is itself a derivation output, `bar.drv` from `foo.drv`). To that end, we create `Single{Derivation,BuiltPath}` types, that are very similar except instead of having multiple outputs (in a set or map), they have a single one. This is for everything to the left of the rightmost `^`. `NixStringContextElem` has an analogous change, and now can reuse `SingleDerivedPath` at the top level. In fact, if we ever get rid of `DrvDeep`, `NixStringContextElem` could be replaced with `SingleDerivedPath` entirely! Important note: some JSON formats have changed. We already can *produce* dynamic derivations, but we can't refer to them directly. Today, we can merely express building or example at the top imperatively over time by building `foo.drv^bar.drv`, and then with a second nix invocation doing `<result-from-first>^baz`, but this is not declarative. The ethos of Nix of being able to write down the full plan everything you want to do, and then execute than plan with a single command, and for that we need the new inductive form of these types. Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
2023-04-07Finish converting existing comments for internal API docs (#8146)John Ericson
* Finish converting existing comments for internal API docs 99% of this was just reformatting existing comments. Only two exceptions: - Expanded upon `BuildResult::status` compat note - Split up file-level `symbol-table.hh` doc comments to get per-definition docs Also fixed a few whitespace goofs, turning leading tabs to spaces and removing trailing spaces. Picking up from #8133 * Fix two things from comments * Use triple-backtick not indent for `dumpPath` * Convert GNU-style `\`..'` quotes to markdown style in API docs This will render correctly.
2023-03-31Ensure all headers have `#pragma once` and are in API docsJohn Ericson
`///@file` makes them show up in the internal API dos. A tiny few were missing `#pragma once`.
2023-01-11Improve `OutputsSpec` slightlyJohn Ericson
A few little changes preparing for the rest.
2023-01-10Make clear that `StorePathWithOutputs` is a deprecated typeJohn Ericson
- Add a comment - Put `OutputsSpec` in a different header (First part of #6815) - Make a few stray uses of it in new code use `DerivedPath` instead.
2022-05-03nix profile: Support overriding outputsEelco Dolstra
2022-05-03Allow selecting derivation outputs using 'installable!outputs'Eelco Dolstra
E.g. 'nixpkgs#glibc^dev,static' or 'nixpkgs#glibc^*'.
2021-04-05buildable.{cc,hh} -> derived-path.{cc,hh}John Ericson
2021-04-05Rename BuildableJohn Ericson
2021-04-05Use `BuildableReq` for `buildPaths` and `ensurePath`John Ericson
This avoids an ambiguity where the `StorePathWithOutputs { drvPath, {} }` could mean "build `brvPath`" or "substitute `drvPath`" depending on context. It also brings the internals closer in line to the new CLI, by generalizing the `Buildable` type is used there and makes that distinction already. In doing so, relegate `StorePathWithOutputs` to being a type just for backwards compatibility (CLI and RPC).
2021-04-05Move `StorePathWithOutput` utilities out of store classJohn Ericson
These are by no means part of the notion of a store, but rather are things that happen to use stores. (Or put another way, there's no way we'd make them virtual methods any time soon.) It's better to move them out of that too-big class then. Also, this helps us remove StorePathWithOutputs from the Store interface altogether next commit.
2021-04-05Move `StorePathWithOutputs` into its own header/fileJohn Ericson
In the following commits it will become less prevalent.