| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Factor out bits of the worker protocol to use elsewhere
(cherry picked from commit 4b1a97338f517f45e6169d3d8845c5caa5724e97)
Change-Id: If93afa0f8b1cf9b0e705b34fa71e6fd708752758
|
|
Unit test some worker protocol serializers
(cherry picked from commit c6faef61a6f31c71146aee5d88168e861df9a22a)
Change-Id: I99e36f5f17eb7642211a4e42a16b143424f164b4
|
|
Pass this around instead of `Source &` and `Sink &` directly. This will
give us something to put the protocol version on once the time comes.
To do this ergonomically, we need to expose `RemoteStore::Connection`,
so do that too. Give it some more API docs while we are at it.
|
|
See API docs on that struct for why. The pasing as as template argument
doesn't yet happen in that commit, but will instead happen in later
commit.
Also make `WorkerOp` (now `Op`) and enum struct. This led us to catch
that two operations were not handled!
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
This is generally a fine practice: Putting implementations in headers
makes them harder to read and slows compilation. Unfortunately it is
necessary for templates, but we can ameliorate that by putting them in a
separate header. Only files which need to instantiate those templates
will need to include the header with the implementation; the rest can
just include the declaration.
This is now documenting in the contributing guide.
Also, it just happens that these polymorphic serializers are the
protocol agnostic ones. (Worker and serve protocol have the same logic
for these container types.) This means by doing this general template
cleanup, we are also getting a head start on better indicating which
code is protocol-specific and which code is shared between protocols.
|
