| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is probably what most people expect it to do. Fixes #3781.
There is a new command 'nix flake lock' that has the old behaviour of
'nix flake update', i.e. it just adds missing lock file entries unless
overriden using --update-input.
|
|
libutil: EPERM from kill(-1, ...) is fine
|
|
|
|
This is technically a breaking change, since attempting to set plugin
files after the first non-flag argument will now throw an error. This
is acceptable given the relative lack of stability in a plugin
interface and the need to tie the knot somewhere once plugins can
actually define new subcommands.
|
|
When performing distributed builds of machine learning packages, it
would be nice if builders without the required SIMD instructions can
be excluded as build nodes.
Since x86_64 has accumulated a large number of different instruction
set extensions, listing all possible extensions would be unwieldy.
AMD, Intel, Red Hat, and SUSE have recently defined four different
microarchitecture levels that are now part of the x86-64 psABI
supplement and will be used in glibc 2.33:
https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI
https://lwn.net/Articles/844831/
This change uses libcpuid to detect CPU features and then uses them to
add the supported x86_64 levels to the additional system types. For
example on a Ryzen 3700X:
$ ~/aps/bin/nix -vv --version | grep "Additional system"
Additional system types: i686-linux, x86_64-v1-linux, x86_64-v2-linux, x86_64-v3-linux
|
|
|
|
I tested a trivial program that called kill(-1, SIGKILL), which was
run as the only process for an unpriveleged user, on Linux and
FreeBSD. On Linux, kill reported success, while on FreeBSD it failed
with EPERM.
POSIX says:
> If pid is -1, sig shall be sent to all processes (excluding an
> unspecified set of system processes) for which the process has
> permission to send that signal.
and
> The kill() function is successful if the process has permission to
> send sig to any of the processes specified by pid. If kill() fails,
> no signal shall be sent.
and
> [EPERM]
> The process does not have permission to send the signal to any
> receiving process.
My reading of this is that kill(-1, ...) may fail with EPERM when
there are no other processes to kill (since the current process is
ignored). Since kill(-1, ...) only attempts to kill processes the
user has permission to kill, it can't mean that we tried to do
something we didn't have permission to kill, so it should be fine to
interpret EPERM the same as success here for any POSIX-compliant
system.
This fixes an issue that Mic92 encountered[1] when he tried to review a
Nixpkgs PR on FreeBSD.
[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/81459#issuecomment-606073668
|
|
Despite being an ugly hack, it can probably be useful in a couple extra
places
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve error formatting
|
|
|
|
It's now
at /home/eelco/Dev/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/misc/hello/default.nix:7:7:
instead of
at: (7:7) in file: /home/eelco/Dev/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/misc/hello/default.nix
The new format is more standard and clickable.
|
|
|
|
Changes:
* The divider lines are gone. These were in practice a bit confusing,
in particular with --show-trace or --keep-going, since then there
were multiple lines, suggesting a start/end which wasn't the case.
* Instead, multi-line error messages are now indented to align with
the prefix (e.g. "error: ").
* The 'description' field is gone since we weren't really using it.
* 'hint' is renamed to 'msg' since it really wasn't a hint.
* The error is now printed *before* the location info.
* The 'name' field is no longer printed since most of the time it
wasn't very useful since it was just the name of the exception (like
EvalError). Ideally in the future this would be a unique, easily
googleable error ID (like rustc).
* "trace:" is now just "…". This assumes error contexts start with
something like "while doing X".
Example before:
error: --- AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- nix
at: (7:7) in file: /home/eelco/Dev/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/misc/hello/default.nix
6|
7| x = assert false; 1;
| ^
8|
assertion 'false' failed
----------------------------------------------------- show-trace -----------------------------------------------------
trace: while evaluating the attribute 'x' of the derivation 'hello-2.10'
at: (192:11) in file: /home/eelco/Dev/nixpkgs/pkgs/stdenv/generic/make-derivation.nix
191| // (lib.optionalAttrs (!(attrs ? name) && attrs ? pname && attrs ? version)) {
192| name = "${attrs.pname}-${attrs.version}";
| ^
193| } // (lib.optionalAttrs (stdenv.hostPlatform != stdenv.buildPlatform && !dontAddHostSuffix && (attrs ? name || (attrs ? pname && attrs ? version)))) {
Example after:
error: assertion 'false' failed
at: (7:7) in file: /home/eelco/Dev/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/misc/hello/default.nix
6|
7| x = assert false; 1;
| ^
8|
… while evaluating the attribute 'x' of the derivation 'hello-2.10'
at: (192:11) in file: /home/eelco/Dev/nixpkgs/pkgs/stdenv/generic/make-derivation.nix
191| // (lib.optionalAttrs (!(attrs ? name) && attrs ? pname && attrs ? version)) {
192| name = "${attrs.pname}-${attrs.version}";
| ^
193| } // (lib.optionalAttrs (stdenv.hostPlatform != stdenv.buildPlatform && !dontAddHostSuffix && (attrs ? name || (attrs ? pname && attrs ? version)))) {
|
|
|
|
2259 error message - "auto-call" error
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation for nix subcommands
|
|
|
|
|
|
This deadlocks ProgressBar, e.g.
# nix run --impure --no-substitute --store '/tmp/nix2?store=/foo' --expr 'derivation { builder = /nix/store/zi90rxslsm4mlr46l2xws1rm94g7pk8p-busybox-1.31.1-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/bin/busybox; }'
leads to
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff6126e80 (LWP 12250)):
#0 0x00007ffff7215d62 in __lll_lock_wait () from /nix/store/9df65igwjmf2wbw0gbrrgair6piqjgmi-glibc-2.31/lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x00007ffff720e721 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /nix/store/9df65igwjmf2wbw0gbrrgair6piqjgmi-glibc-2.31/lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 0x00007ffff7ad17fa in __gthread_mutex_lock (__mutex=0x6c5448) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/gthr-default.h:749
#3 std::mutex::lock (this=0x6c5448) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/std_mutex.h:100
#4 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::lock (this=0x7fffffff09a8, this=0x7fffffff09a8) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/unique_lock.h:141
#5 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::unique_lock (__m=..., this=0x7fffffff09a8) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/bits/unique_lock.h:71
#6 nix::Sync<nix::ProgressBar::State, std::mutex>::Lock::Lock (s=0x6c5448, this=0x7fffffff09a0) at src/libutil/sync.hh:45
#7 nix::Sync<nix::ProgressBar::State, std::mutex>::lock (this=0x6c5448) at src/libutil/sync.hh:85
#8 nix::ProgressBar::logEI (this=0x6c5440, ei=...) at src/libmain/progress-bar.cc:131
#9 0x00007ffff7608cfd in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x6c5440) at src/libutil/logging.hh:88
#10 nix::getCodeLines (errPos=...) at src/libutil/error.cc:66
#11 0x00007ffff76073f2 in nix::showErrorInfo (out=..., einfo=..., showTrace=<optimized out>) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/optional:897
#12 0x00007ffff7ad19e7 in nix::ProgressBar::logEI (this=0x6c5440, ei=...) at src/libmain/progress-bar.cc:134
#13 0x00007ffff7ab9d10 in nix::Logger::logEI (ei=..., lvl=nix::lvlError, this=0x6c5440) at src/libutil/logging.hh:88
#14 nix::handleExceptions(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::function<void ()>) (programName="/home/eelco/Dev/nix/outputs/out/bin/nix", fun=...) at src/libmain/shared.cc:328
#15 0x000000000046226b in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /nix/store/h31cy7jm6g7cfqbhc5pm4rf9c53i3qfb-gcc-9.3.0/include/c++/9.3.0/ext/new_allocator.h:80
|
|
|
|
This is like syslog's LOG_NOTICE: "normal, but significant,
condition".
|
|
In `nixStable` (2.3.7 to be precise) it's possible to connect to stores
using an IPv6 address:
nix ping-store --store ssh://root@2001:db8::1
This is also useful for `nixops(1)` where you could specify an IPv6
address in `deployment.targetHost`.
However, this behavior is broken on `nixUnstable` and fails with the
following error:
$ nix store ping --store ssh://root@2001:db8::1
don't know how to open Nix store 'ssh://root@2001:db8::1'
This happened because `openStore` from `libstore` uses the `parseURL`
function from `libfetchers` which expects a valid URL as defined in
RFC2732. However, this is unsupported by `ssh(1)`:
$ nix store ping --store 'ssh://root@[2001:db8::1]'
cannot connect to 'root@[2001:db8::1]'
This patch now allows both ways of specifying a store (`root@2001:db8::1`) and
also `root@[2001:db8::1]` since the latter one is useful to pass query
parameters to the remote store.
In order to achieve this, the following changes were made:
* The URL regex from `url-parts.hh` now allows an IPv6 address in the
form `2001:db8::1` and also `[2001:db8::1]`.
* In `libstore`, a new function named `extractConnStr` ensures that a
proper URL is passed to e.g. `ssh(1)`:
* If a URL looks like either `[2001:db8::1]` or `root@[2001:db8::1]`,
the brackets will be removed using a regex. No additional validation
is done here as only strings parsed by `parseURL` are expected.
* In any other case, the string will be left untouched.
* The rules above only apply for `LegacySSHStore` and `SSHStore` (a.k.a
`ssh://` and `ssh-ng://`).
Unresolved questions:
* I'm not really sure whether we want to allow both variants of IPv6
addresses in the URL parser. However it should be noted that both seem
to be possible according to RFC2732:
> This document incudes an update to the generic syntax for Uniform
> Resource Identifiers defined in RFC 2396 [URL]. It defines a syntax
> for IPv6 addresses and allows the use of "[" and "]" within a URI
> explicitly for this reserved purpose.
* Currently, it's not supported to specify a port number behind the
hostname, however it seems as this is not really supported by the URL
parser. Hence, this is probably out of scope here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This gets rid of some pointless casts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using fallocate() to preallocate files space does more harm than good:
- breaks compression on btrfs
- has been called "not the right thing to do" by xfs developers
(because delayed allocation that most filesystems implement leads to smarter
allocation than what the filesystem needs to do if we upfront fallocate files)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes: warning: unknown setting 'extra-sandbox-paths'
|
|
Crucially this introduces BoehmGCStackAllocator, but it also
adds a bunch of wiring to avoid making libutil depend on bdw-gc.
Part of the solutions for #4178, #4200
|
|
|
|
|
|
This removes the extra-substituters and extra-sandbox-paths settings
and instead makes every array setting extensible by setting
"extra-<name> = <value>" in the configuration file or passing
"--<name> <value>" on the command line.
|
