| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Cleanup `fmt.hh`
(cherry picked from commit 47a1dbb4b8e7913cbb9b4d604728b912e76e4ca0)
Change-Id: Id076a45cb39652f437fe3f8bda10c310a9894777
|
|
While preparing PRs like #9753, I've had to change error messages in
dozens of code paths. It would be nice if instead of
EvalError("expected 'boolean' but found '%1%'", showType(v))
we could write
TypeError(v, "boolean")
or similar. Then, changing the error message could be a mechanical
refactor with the compiler pointing out places the constructor needs to
be changed, rather than the error-prone process of grepping through the
codebase. Structured errors would also help prevent the "same" error
from having multiple slightly different messages, and could be a first
step towards error codes / an error index.
This PR reworks the exception infrastructure in `libexpr` to
support exception types with different constructor signatures than
`BaseError`. Actually refactoring the exceptions to use structured data
will come in a future PR (this one is big enough already, as it has to
touch every exception in `libexpr`).
The core design is in `eval-error.hh`. Generally, errors like this:
state.error("'%s' is not a string", getAttrPathStr())
.debugThrow<TypeError>()
are transformed like this:
state.error<TypeError>("'%s' is not a string", getAttrPathStr())
.debugThrow()
The type annotation has moved from `ErrorBuilder::debugThrow` to
`EvalState::error`.
(cherry picked from commit c6a89c1a1659b31694c0fbcd21d78a6dd521c732)
Change-Id: Iced91ba4e00ca9e801518071fb43798936cbd05a
|
|
Don't print the first bracket in values in magenta in error messages
(cherry picked from commit 46a0625a40aef6946a35f92fdacf0e6b4a14414f)
Change-Id: I8435565c87db182116140eaeea9df1243e67ea94
|
|
Print the value in `error: cannot coerce` messages
(cherry picked from commit 5b7bfd2d6b89d7dd5f54c1ca6c8072358d31a84e)
===
test taken from 6e8d5983143ae576e3f4b1d2954a5267f2943a49; it was added
previously (and not backported because its pr was a mostly-revert), but
it's useful to have around.
Change-Id: Icbd14b55e3610ce7b774667bf14b82e6dc717982
|
|
libexpr: print value of what is attempted to be called as function
(cherry picked from commit 50e5d7b883042852538371237e32a66bb22f0485)
Change-Id: I7cb6290bd8f244e83bfce3b2eed2a4c8b4f16a83
|
|
Print the value in `value is X while a Y is expected` error
(cherry picked from commit 5f72a97092da6af28a7d2b2a50d74e9d34fae7e1)
Change-Id: Idb4bc903ae59a0f5b6fb3b1da4d47970fe0a6efe
|
|
builtins.concatMap: Fix typo in error message
(cherry picked from commit 4292d997568eb30503e287f98e24821ff0bc2816)
Change-Id: Ia33d1b02e41f699ef0c8c2d6487c9f70b2cc8cf4
|
|
Today, with the tests inside a `tests` intermingled with the
corresponding library's source code, we have a few problems:
- We have to be careful that wildcards don't end up with tests being
built as part of Nix proper, or test headers being installed as part
of Nix proper.
- Tests in libraries but not executables is not right:
- It means each executable runs the previous unit tests again, because
it needs the libraries.
- It doesn't work right on Windows, which doesn't want you to load a
DLL just for the side global variable . It could be made to work
with the dlopen equivalent, but that's gross!
This reorg solves these problems.
There is a remaining problem which is that sibbling headers (like
`hash.hh` the test header vs `hash.hh` the main `libnixutil` header) end
up shadowing each other. This PR doesn't solve that. That is left as
future work for a future PR.
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
(cherry picked from commit 91b6833686a6a6d9eac7f3f66393ec89ef1d3b57)
(cherry picked from commit a61e42adb528b3d40ce43e07c79368d779a8b624)
|
