blob: 04b58145953d10eab906ee031711137b066b7729 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
## Advanced Topic: store entry relocatability
Now that we know the fundamentals of the design of the Nix store, let's explore one consequence of that design: the question when it is permissable to relocate a store entry to a store with a different mount point.
Recall from the section on [store paths](./store-paths.md), concrete store paths look like `<store-dir>/<hash>-<name>`.
~~The two final restrictions of the previous section yield an alternative view of the same information.~~
Rather than associating store dirs with the references, we can say a store entry itself has a store dir if and only if it has at least one reference.
This corresponds to the observation that a store entry with references, i.e. with a store directory under this interpretation, is confined to stores sharing that same store directory, but a store entry without any references, i.e. thus without a store directory, can exist in any store.
Lastly, this illustrates the purpose of tracking self references.
Store entries without self-references or other references are relocatable, while store paths with self-references aren't.
This is used to tell apart e.g. source code which can be stored anywhere, and pesky non-reloctable executables which assume they are installed to a certain path.
\[The default method of calculating references by scanning for store paths handles these two example cases surprisingly well.\]
|