aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/thesis/parts/results.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'thesis/parts/results.tex')
-rw-r--r--thesis/parts/results.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/thesis/parts/results.tex b/thesis/parts/results.tex
index 4db297d..622cb12 100644
--- a/thesis/parts/results.tex
+++ b/thesis/parts/results.tex
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ In all but two of our test cases (marked with *), we correctly identify the best
\begin{table}[h!]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|}
- & Project & Container Type & Best implementation & Predicted best \\
+ Incorrect & Project & Container Type & Best implementation & Predicted best \\
\hline
& aoc\_2021\_09 & Map & HashMap & HashMap \\
& aoc\_2021\_09 & Set & HashSet & HashSet \\
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ Future work could take a more complex approach that finds the best threshold val
\subsection{Evaluation}
Overall, we find that the main part of our container selection system has merit.
-Whilst our testing has limitations, it shows that we can correctly identify the best container even in complex programs.
+While our testing has limitations, it shows that we can correctly identify the best container even in complex programs.
More work is needed on improving our system's performance for very small containers, and on testing with a wider range of programs.
Our proposed technique for identifying adaptive containers appears ineffective.